In: Random
27 Sep 2007I had no intention to write this article today, but as always I read too much news and from time to find get offended to the point of writing. Today that happened when I read this article.
Posted on News.com, Don Reisinger gives us his compelling argument on "Why Microsoft must abandon Vista to save itself." The key points that spell the failure and fall of Microsoft are Vista’s price, poor sales figures, and it’s inclusion of DRM technologies.
I have spoken to all of these before, but in case you weren’t listening, let’s catch everyone up.
Vista’s Price Point
I really couldn’t be more tired of people whining about the price of Vista. Of the mass of computer users currently on Windows XP, how many of these users have a sincere need to upgrade to Vista. With the exception of some hardcore gamers wanting the latest Direct X 10 action, I am saying nil. Currently at Dell, I can get an AMD Sempron 3600+, Vista Home Basic, 1 GB 250 GB Hard Disk. Vista Home Basic retails for $209.00 at CDW for a full licensed copy (non-upgrade.) Let’s face it, those people who are really going to get Vista are buying a new machine. Since every major manufacture pays the "Windows Tax" anyway, the license is included in the system.
In Dell’s pricing structure, to upgrade this system to Vista Home Premium, it costs you a whopping $27 over the basic OS install. I hardly call that price gouging for the features that you get included with Premium over Basic. They charge you $89 to go from Premium to Business or $109 for Premium to Ultimate. Let’s quit banging a dead horse. for the majority of users, Vista is not overpriced. You can compare this argument directly with the cell phone pricing schemes. Cell phones are way overpriced too if you buy them without service.
Poor Sales Figures
What is poor? Microsoft’s press release claims 20,000,000 copies in the first month. Kanye West’s album sold 700,000 in it’s first week, Halo 3 expects to sell 4 million copies in October. I have a hard time saying that’s weak. Considering nearly every new computer is shipping with Vista, it’s not slowing down.
Inclusion of DRM
This is the one that really gets my goat. The DRM strategy that everyone is complaining about has not been implemented. If it were to be implemented, everyone who wanted to play HD content on their computers over HDMI connections would be out of luck. Why be upset at Microsoft for future proofing the legal use of media on their operating system. That just seems like a safe bet to me. It’s not like it hinders usage of your system at all, and if you do end up buying media that supports this technology, you will actually be able to use it. Where’s the black op in this transaction? This argument is always carried out by people who want to steal content anyway. If you want to complain about DRM, complain to the media companies embedding it in their product, not the hardware and software that allows you to use it.
Final Word…
I have said this so many times, I want to scream. Don’t upgrade to Vista. Sure there are exceptions, if your box says it’s Vista Certified, you are probably golden, if not, wait until you legitimately need a new computer. There is no significant reason (yet) to upgrade to Vista. Microsoft has a good solid product. Sure, it’s having to dance around it’s status as a spy ware/virus target leaves some users frustrated, but not nearly frustrated as a Windows XP box full of mal ware with a virus infected disk full of ruined data.
Vista is a nice operating system. I have tried several flavors of it and have had no issues except for some driver compatibility issues with some unique audio hardware. I don’t fault Vista for that, I didn’t expect it to support high end audio gear out of the box when the high end sequencers don’t support it yet anyway. So don’t buy into the hype. If I was purchasing a new Windows computer today I would get Vista on it.

Jason Burns is a technology enthusiast, Microsoft guy, photographer, musician and all around geek. This blog is the general rambling one, check out the links for the specific ones!

2 Responses to Give Vista a Break…
Joseph Crawford
September 28th, 2007 at 3:54 pm
I used Windows based PC’s for 12 years before switching to the Mac platform and I never would have switched before OS X.
All I have to say is that we bought a new Dell laptop with Windows Vista Home or whatever they call that version (they have way too many versions).
When I first laid hands on this it was the slowest machine I had ever seen with Windows. I had to disable EVERYTHING when it came to the eye candy. Once I disabled all of that it was ok, it moves at an alright pace, not snappy by any means. We have 1 GB of ram in that laptop and one would think that would be enough. I guess if you are going to buy a Vista based machine you better get at-least 2 GB of ram.
As for the price point yes MS makes it cost effective when you buy a new machine. Maybe with Vista that’s what they wanted to push was the purchase of a new machine. However WHY should you HAVE to buy a new machine that is VISTA CERTIFIED?
Oh how dare you call windows versions flavors
Maarten Kooiker
September 29th, 2007 at 8:07 am
Don’t blame Windows for the lack of drivers? That’s the exact reason that many people are complaining about Linux (and it is a weak point of Linux at this moment I think), so I think it is quite justified to blame windows for the same mistake.
Further, if you want the same performance (let’s say the aereo visual eye-candy stuff) you manage to do that with a linux distribution which requires only 256Mb of RAM, unlike the 1 Gb Vista wants. So in the end you will have to pay less both for the software AND the hardware to obtain the same performance! want to check it out? just check my blog!
Editor’s Note: Sometimes to move forward, you have to break existing connections to older, poorer architectures. Windows is making a clean break from some of the severely legacy hardware and I for one am all for it. Now if we could get them to ditch 16 bit Windows apps too. Linux is great and I use Fedora 7 personally and love it, I also use a Macbook Pro with OS X also. I am saying that Vista is a good operating system. You don’t bitch that your Nintendo Wii doesn’t play your old NES cartridges. Sometimes you have to move forward at the expense of legacy equiment. Why does everyone assume that if you release a new operating system, a requirement is that it is able to perform well on crap hardware. Who says everyone HAS to upgrade to Vista???