<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Has Amazon lost their mind? $349 2nd Gen Nano</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.philoking.com/2008/05/05/has-amazon-lost-their-mind-349-2nd-gen-nano/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.philoking.com/2008/05/05/has-amazon-lost-their-mind-349-2nd-gen-nano/</link>
	<description>Computing for the OS Agnostic</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 06:10:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wade Dorrell</title>
		<link>http://www.philoking.com/2008/05/05/has-amazon-lost-their-mind-349-2nd-gen-nano/comment-page-1/#comment-18806</link>
		<dc:creator>Wade Dorrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 23:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philoking.com/2008/05/05/has-amazon-lost-their-mind-349-2nd-gen-nano/#comment-18806</guid>
		<description>I swear I read an article about Amazon&#039;s allowed margin for error on product listings being pretty high, can&#039;t find it anymore though. With a product database as large as Amazon&#039;s, certainly approximate correctness of product listings is OK.

It&#039;s odd to see it happen with what I presume is a big-volume category like iPod though... but hey, if the algorithms say people will pay it and the margins are worth more than the bad press from bloggers, why wouldn&#039;t a good AI sell old iPods at high margin to suckers for a while? Perhaps after one hit with a referer other than amazon.com to a product listing that never gets referer hits occurs, the algorithms could snap it back to the normal pricing... nothing to see here, move along. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I swear I read an article about Amazon&#8217;s allowed margin for error on product listings being pretty high, can&#8217;t find it anymore though. With a product database as large as Amazon&#8217;s, certainly approximate correctness of product listings is OK.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s odd to see it happen with what I presume is a big-volume category like iPod though&#8230; but hey, if the algorithms say people will pay it and the margins are worth more than the bad press from bloggers, why wouldn&#8217;t a good AI sell old iPods at high margin to suckers for a while? Perhaps after one hit with a referer other than amazon.com to a product listing that never gets referer hits occurs, the algorithms could snap it back to the normal pricing&#8230; nothing to see here, move along. <img src='http://www.philoking.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RaZella</title>
		<link>http://www.philoking.com/2008/05/05/has-amazon-lost-their-mind-349-2nd-gen-nano/comment-page-1/#comment-18803</link>
		<dc:creator>RaZella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 20:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philoking.com/2008/05/05/has-amazon-lost-their-mind-349-2nd-gen-nano/#comment-18803</guid>
		<description>Wow, they have lost their minds. That purchase better come with 150.00 in itunes giftcards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, they have lost their minds. That purchase better come with 150.00 in itunes giftcards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

