In: Technology
6 Jul 2009
I had to laugh at a recent development on a thread I have been following. For the most part the conversation has been lively, relevant and fun with a little good natured MS and Apple ribbing here and there, but one comment posted tonight kind of quantified the type of “Stockholm Syndrome” that many Apple users seem to have to the almighty fruit.
I had left a comment earlier saying I was frustrated a few years ago when I bought a brand new Powerbook 12” and a Dual 2.0Ghz G5 PowerMac within a few months of Aperture’s original release. As both of those machines lacked video cards with Core Graphics support, I was left out in the cold of Aperture support on both machines. (Although it did seem there was a hack you could do to enable the support which makes me wonder why they didn’t support them after all – but that’s another topic | while I am on topics, Adobe Lightroom manages non-destructive image editing without Core Graphics, but I digress again
)
So here I am with what amounts to $5,000 worth of new computers that are both unable to run Apple’s latest software.
The comment that rubbed me the wrong way said:
I have to nit pick with your examples contrasting Microsoft’s generous and noble legacy support with Apple’s irresponsible abandonment. You mentioned you had a dual-2Ghz Power Mac G5 that wouldn’t run Aperture due to the lack of Core Image support. I also had a Power Mac G5. At worst, you would have had to do a graphics card upgrade (even the ATI 9600 would work) to run Aperture on it. Graphics card upgrades are not unheard of in the Windows world, either.
Bot.
Ok, you got me, graphics card upgrades are common. Of course the PowerMac could not be upgraded, but setting that aside, this is a perfect example of the Apple fan mentality. They are so agreeable, that they find it totally reasonable to have to replace the video card in a $3,000 computer, two months after purchase, to support the latest software. Am I the only one that finds that a bit odd?
Let’s run down some of the things they have done recently:
- Snow Leopard officially drops support for PowerPC computers, that means in 2006 Apple began a transition to Intel chips in Macs. I think it was a great move. OS X supports universal binaries so apps can be written to support both platforms, sweet right? Except here we are in 2009, and your Three year old “Super Computer” they sold you is at it’s end of life as far as being able to run Apple’s newest OS. To think people give Microsoft shit about Vista requiring something newer and up to date for decent performance, G5s and below are cut off for good. Ouch.
- Although they seem to have recently have had a change of heart, Apple recently decided you had to spend big bucks to get FireWire, and dumped it off all but the high end Macbook Pros. Game changing, no? But if you are a digital audio or video geek, suddenly you were searching for used laptops when you wanted to upgrade.
Of course those are two little incidents, but I just wonder why so few people in the Apple camp find it offensive when Apple arbitrarily makes a design decision that is so obviously not customer motivated. If they decide something is aesthetically unpleasing to Steve Jobs, it risks getting the axe, no matter what the customer thinks.
I recently read an article where Jonathan Ive said that Apple doesn’t do any sort of focus group testing, and I see how that has it’s advantages, but I also think that being so out of touch with your customers can be a cancer also. Once the Apple love affair ends, people are going to start getting upset at iPhones and iPods that get replaced way before your contract allows an upgrade, or features mysteriously being jettisoned even when many people use them.
And of course, when they charge you extra for features you should have gotten free. (n support, iPod OS updates, etc.)
And don’t get me started on replaceable batteries!!!
I want to be clear, I work for Microsoft, but I am an Apple user, I carry an iPhone, I have a 24” iMac, 15.4” Macbook Pro and dual quad 2.8Ghz Mac Pro, even an AppleTV. Of course I have just as many PCs, and I choose a Zune over an iPod, but I think it’s fair to say I am not some Microsoft blue blood that doesn’t have a realistic perspective.

Jason Burns is a technology enthusiast, Microsoft guy, photographer, musician and all around geek. This blog is the general rambling one, check out the links for the specific ones!

9 Responses to The Apple fanboy frame of mind
Mark Crump
July 7th, 2009 at 6:43 am
I’m not sure the Snow Leopard/Vista hardware comparison is valid: when Apple announced the shift from PowerPC to Intel, owners of PPC machines had to look at them as Dead Machines Walking; this isn’t like Apple pulled up in a Vogon ship and announced the plans for the bypass were on file in Alpha Centauri. At some point Apple has to cut off support for that platform and that time is now. It feels logical to me, too. Especially since Snow Leopard isn’t the bells-and-whistles upgrade Leopard was. Also, wasn’t the knock on Vista that it ran like crap on older hardware, or you needed a decent card for the 3d effects? I actually didn’t pay much attention to Vista when it came out.
The firewire is a valid argument. I’m not sure it was aesthetics, or what, but at least they put it back.
I think you’re off-base with the iPhone upgrade though: that’s not Apple’s fault. If I had a Blackberry and RIM announced the New Shiny, I’d likely be screwed on upgrades for that.
That was a fun discussion though, and I applaud you for sticking your head in as much as you did.
Timothy Warren (timw4mail)
July 7th, 2009 at 6:06 pm
Although it is sad to see the only other popular computer architecture die, at the same time, this means less bloated binaries, as software shifts to Intel only, and it also means the usual (although, I guess unintentional) lockout of the previous versions of the OS to the latest software.
Maybe the Intel architecture will lead to longer software compatibility? Who knows?
Windows has its own problems with too much backwards compatibility that in some ways inhibits it moving forward.
Perhaps there should be some sort of compromise, so that you get the best balance of progress and backwards-compatibility?
Jason Burns
July 8th, 2009 at 10:23 am
I am not saying it isn’t for the best, I am saying if I bought the top of the line PowerMac G5, loaded to the gills, for pushing $10k in January 2006, and it’s my media workhorse, I would be pissed off that here, 3 years later, it’s quashed for OS updates. That’s bad.
Mark Crump
July 8th, 2009 at 10:27 am
Now, I realize I’m heading into the Apple Fanboi Line, but why did you spend 10k on a PPC-based machine 6 months after Apple announced it was phasing away from that processor?
Timothy Warren (timw4mail)
July 8th, 2009 at 10:31 am
While I do agree somewhat, you have to consider that the computer isn’t going to just stop working all of a sudden.
While I will agree the lack of OS updates isn’t ideal, you don’t have to have the latest to be productive. It may take more time to get the being productive, but you aren’t out of luck.
To be honest, if I were in that situation, I would try out a PowerPC version of Linux, and go from there. I’m not really in favor of the short, and shortening lifetime of the average computer, but at the same time, you don’t have to just throw it away.
writersmark » Apple Fanboism and the Inevitable Windows Apple Comparison.
July 9th, 2009 at 5:44 pm
[...] had a lively discussion and a brave soul from Microsoft chimed in, and a comment on his blog struck me as a topic for here: I had to laugh at a recent development on a thread I have been [...]
Mark Crump
July 9th, 2009 at 5:47 pm
Because I can’t resist my own comments: http://www.writersmark.com/2009/07/09/apple-fanboism-and-the-inevitable-windows-apple-comparison/
Azizi Khan
July 13th, 2009 at 7:03 pm
My comments :
http://www.azizikhan.net/?p=64
Gabriel
July 30th, 2009 at 5:53 am
I think that the root of Apple Fanboyism, if we’re talking in legitimate terms about thoughtful individuals, not wealthy suburban tweens, is tragically synonymous with the cliche distinction that Apples are for artists, and PCs are for bureaucrats. The cliche, of course, is ridiculous on a content level, because as you stated- PCs simply have more power and better function when it comes to packing in the ram and tossing around huge image files. But on a form level, the distinction between Apple’s M.O. and Microsoft’s M.O. is very much an artist vs society sort of paradigm. Form vs Function; should the experience of using the machines be enjoyable as a process, or should the product of using them be of higher value?