<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala &#8211; Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.philoking.com/2009/10/26/ubuntu-9-10-karmic-koala-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.philoking.com/2009/10/26/ubuntu-9-10-karmic-koala-review/</link>
	<description>Computing for the OS Agnostic</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 06:10:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archos</title>
		<link>http://www.philoking.com/2009/10/26/ubuntu-9-10-karmic-koala-review/comment-page-1/#comment-23788</link>
		<dc:creator>Archos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philoking.com/2009/10/26/ubuntu-9-10-karmic-koala-review/#comment-23788</guid>
		<description>Amateur and cheap???? Are you kidding? I will agree about the cheap part since after all, Ubuntu is completely free. It&#039;s stupid to say that Ubuntu is an amateur when compared to either Windows or Mac OS. Have you even tried do some decent research about Ubuntu or Linux in general? Any version of Windows or Mac OS can&#039;t even match Linux&#039;s kernel and file system technology. The interface isn&#039;t ugly, let alone dated. It may not look like Windows or Mac OS, but it&#039;s their way of being different. Besides, Gnome can be transformed into other looks that is either as sleek as both Windows and Mac OS or better. That&#039;s how flexible Linux is. Your so called review is obviously based on your very little time of using Ubuntu. I suggest you do some research and use it more before you make such groundless claims.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amateur and cheap???? Are you kidding? I will agree about the cheap part since after all, Ubuntu is completely free. It&#8217;s stupid to say that Ubuntu is an amateur when compared to either Windows or Mac OS. Have you even tried do some decent research about Ubuntu or Linux in general? Any version of Windows or Mac OS can&#8217;t even match Linux&#8217;s kernel and file system technology. The interface isn&#8217;t ugly, let alone dated. It may not look like Windows or Mac OS, but it&#8217;s their way of being different. Besides, Gnome can be transformed into other looks that is either as sleek as both Windows and Mac OS or better. That&#8217;s how flexible Linux is. Your so called review is obviously based on your very little time of using Ubuntu. I suggest you do some research and use it more before you make such groundless claims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

