<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 10 Reasons I don&#8217;t &#8220;Get&#8221; Google Chrome OS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.philoking.com/2009/11/19/top-10-reasons-i-dont-get-google-chrome-os/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.philoking.com/2009/11/19/top-10-reasons-i-dont-get-google-chrome-os/</link>
	<description>Computing for the OS Agnostic</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 06:10:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fernando</title>
		<link>http://www.philoking.com/2009/11/19/top-10-reasons-i-dont-get-google-chrome-os/comment-page-1/#comment-23715</link>
		<dc:creator>Fernando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 12:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philoking.com/2009/11/19/top-10-reasons-i-dont-get-google-chrome-os/#comment-23715</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t like online apps at all.
They are limited in funcionality, slow, etc. I agree with you.
They are getting better, but not better enough.

I read my email mainly using outlook, using live mail and outlook connector. 
It is great to have an online (rich feature) page to access your mail, but I prefer reading it in my computer with a local app, not having to depend in the network connection speed.

This sole reason is why I use live mail instead of google mail (pop3 is not a good option).

But there is a stronger reason, that you have not mention, why I don&#039;t want to use online apps every day: I don&#039;t want a single company to have complete access to my files, data, and activities.

Many people blames MS for being a Monopoly in OS, and taps Google shoulders for giving as free and open source software and services.

I find Google much more dangerous than MS: it is intrusive, it controls your information and activities, a kind of Big brother, but much more subtle and hidden.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like online apps at all.<br />
They are limited in funcionality, slow, etc. I agree with you.<br />
They are getting better, but not better enough.</p>
<p>I read my email mainly using outlook, using live mail and outlook connector.<br />
It is great to have an online (rich feature) page to access your mail, but I prefer reading it in my computer with a local app, not having to depend in the network connection speed.</p>
<p>This sole reason is why I use live mail instead of google mail (pop3 is not a good option).</p>
<p>But there is a stronger reason, that you have not mention, why I don&#8217;t want to use online apps every day: I don&#8217;t want a single company to have complete access to my files, data, and activities.</p>
<p>Many people blames MS for being a Monopoly in OS, and taps Google shoulders for giving as free and open source software and services.</p>
<p>I find Google much more dangerous than MS: it is intrusive, it controls your information and activities, a kind of Big brother, but much more subtle and hidden.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tiensdirect</title>
		<link>http://www.philoking.com/2009/11/19/top-10-reasons-i-dont-get-google-chrome-os/comment-page-1/#comment-23532</link>
		<dc:creator>tiensdirect</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philoking.com/2009/11/19/top-10-reasons-i-dont-get-google-chrome-os/#comment-23532</guid>
		<description>Google Can&#039;t replace office because each has a specific role to play same as the office phone can&#039;t replace the personal phones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Can&#8217;t replace office because each has a specific role to play same as the office phone can&#8217;t replace the personal phones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Chrome OS &#8211; The Future of Computing? &#124; Techronos</title>
		<link>http://www.philoking.com/2009/11/19/top-10-reasons-i-dont-get-google-chrome-os/comment-page-1/#comment-23453</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Chrome OS &#8211; The Future of Computing? &#124; Techronos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philoking.com/2009/11/19/top-10-reasons-i-dont-get-google-chrome-os/#comment-23453</guid>
		<description>[...] your workstation at the office.  It&#8217;s not meant to replace your phone.  I recently read an article over at Philoking talking about how he couldn&#8217;t totally get behind a machine like [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] your workstation at the office.  It&#8217;s not meant to replace your phone.  I recently read an article over at Philoking talking about how he couldn&#8217;t totally get behind a machine like [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to Make a Solar panel</title>
		<link>http://www.philoking.com/2009/11/19/top-10-reasons-i-dont-get-google-chrome-os/comment-page-1/#comment-23410</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Make a Solar panel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philoking.com/2009/11/19/top-10-reasons-i-dont-get-google-chrome-os/#comment-23410</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with Aric.  Google won&#039;t replace Office, and I don&#039;t think that&#039;s their intention.  But I work with a team that is spread by a minimum of 5,000 miles between each person.  I can&#039;t imagine our collaboration running so smoothly if we couldn&#039;t all access the same documents at the same time and see each other&#039;s changes in real time.  Today&#039;s world is too dynamic for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with Aric.  Google won&#8217;t replace Office, and I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s their intention.  But I work with a team that is spread by a minimum of 5,000 miles between each person.  I can&#8217;t imagine our collaboration running so smoothly if we couldn&#8217;t all access the same documents at the same time and see each other&#8217;s changes in real time.  Today&#8217;s world is too dynamic for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aric</title>
		<link>http://www.philoking.com/2009/11/19/top-10-reasons-i-dont-get-google-chrome-os/comment-page-1/#comment-23408</link>
		<dc:creator>Aric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philoking.com/2009/11/19/top-10-reasons-i-dont-get-google-chrome-os/#comment-23408</guid>
		<description>Like many things, this is (and may always be) a niche product. I&#039;m on board 100% with your comments, but I think there is a place for it. I may create a support website and need a simple and cheap device for my locations to access it. No device (software) support, no periodic updates, no security issues. Simple and cheap with a few functions.

That being said, I don&#039;t think that&#039;s Google&#039;s plan and I think your comments are more in line with their idea of the OS, but then again, like many things, it could lead to new concepts. It is thinking a bit outside the box which is always a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like many things, this is (and may always be) a niche product. I&#8217;m on board 100% with your comments, but I think there is a place for it. I may create a support website and need a simple and cheap device for my locations to access it. No device (software) support, no periodic updates, no security issues. Simple and cheap with a few functions.</p>
<p>That being said, I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s Google&#8217;s plan and I think your comments are more in line with their idea of the OS, but then again, like many things, it could lead to new concepts. It is thinking a bit outside the box which is always a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

