Topaz–Great Plugins for Photoshop, Aperture and Lightroom

December 3rd, 2010 § 1 comment § permalink

Photography can be quite a fun hobby. I used to spend countless hours in Photoshop tweaking photos until I discovered Adobe Lightroom. Now that I have this great seamless workflow, I find I rarely go into Photoshop anymore. Now that I don’t have those pixel pushing color warping capabilities quite so readily available, it’s nice to be able to find ways to get them right at my fingertips in Lightroom.

Topaz makes an incredible suite of plugins available both individually and in bundle form. I won’t talk in detail about the ones I haven’t used personally, but the Topaz suite includes Adjust for HDR effects on single exposure photos, Simplify for making artistic versions of your photos, Clean 2 for smothing and edge styling, DeJPEG for removing JPEG artifacts, DeNoise for removing noise obviously, Detail for sharpening, ReMask for making selection masks and InFocus for sharpening and deblur.

Personally I have used the trial for Simplify and I have purchased InFocus and Adjust.

I’ll include the promo shot from the site, and then a photo of my own that shows real world results with the plugin.

Topaz Adjust

For the uninitiated, HDR or High Dynamic Range photography is usually accomplished by taking a series of photos with different exposure settings, and comp’ing them back together into a single image with a much expanded dynamic range. Adjust is a tool that is able to achieve similar results from a single photo, look at the example below.

adjust

This is a fantastic example of tasteful HDR. A lot of times people go absolutely crazy with it and the image looks like a cartoon. In this you can notice how much the reflections have been pulled out of the finish of the car, the clouds are much more dramatic, the detail in the road is exaggerated and the field absolutely pops with texture. These kinds of details and color saturation are the hallmark of HDR and I have achieved amazing results with this particular plugin. Of the 3 I have used this is the one that I think is an absolute must buy.

Bahama

This was taken about a year ago in the Bahamas. I don’t think I need to tell you that the scene was not this dramatic out of camera.

Simplify

With Topaz simplify, the opposite is the intent. The plugin reduces detail, but in a very attractive way. Simulating several styles of manual art like pencil or painting, Simplify creates artwork that is worthy of hanging from your photos, look at the example below.

simplify

Aside from the stunningly beautiful dog, look how the plugin has managed to capture the detail of the image, and the color, but in a completely believable paint-stroke look. There is even one preset I used that does this in an impressionist fashion with stunning results:

Andy and Mione

This photo is of my son and our dog playing in the creek near our house. I couldn’t love this photo more.

InFocus

This is the newest one I have purchased from the bunch. InFocus is a sharpening and de-blurring tool. I have yet to achieve results as dramatic as the ones in the promo shot below, but I have definitely seen some very nice detail added to my photos.

infocus

My personal opinion would be that this is the least intuitive of the bunch to use, but keep in mind that I have only owned it for about two days. I have become used to having presets to help me learn how to tweak the sliders. I will continue to work with it until I hopefully understand it better.

I think the photo below did benefit from the additional sharpness.

TigerforSheree

I might have went ahead and bought the bundle as I have now spent close to that with just 3 of the plugins. It’s something to consider if you like what you see here. Given the astronomical prices of most good Photoshop plugins, I think these are definitely a bargain.

I can’t say that I love the way you have to leave Lightroom to use them, and it seems VERY slow to sync the changes back into Lightroom, and Adobe problem I am sure.

That being said, these relatively inexpensive plugins could significantly increase the quality of your photographs in a very simple and repeatable way.

Sorting Out Multiple Monitors, Color Profiles and the like

June 6th, 2010 § 0 comments § permalink

Back in the day being into photography, graphic design or video was easy, you just did the best you can when it comes to color. As soon as computers got good at handling color, a new crop of monitor calibrators came out.

Now in a world with one monitor, calibrating your monitor is pretty easy. In a world where we have two, three or more, it becomes less clear. Another wrinkle is that consumer calibrators, like mine, only support a single monitor. That makes calibrating multiple monitors nearly impossible.

IMG_0455

Fear not dear readers, I am going to show you a hack to get past that pesky single monitor limitation, as well as a physical hack to keep yourself square and re-square if you have to disconnect and reconnect your setup.

Tip #1: Know Who You Are Deal With

IMG_0460 I mean monitors! I use the Pac-Man Principle. The way I keep my monitors and profiles straight is by naming my monitors something other than Samsung 204b, and physically naming my color profiles to match. I have three monitors, and left to right I have named them Clyde, Inky and Blinky. On each monitor I have affixed a label (I am a label Nazi) that says “L Clyde,” “M Inky,” and “R Blinky.” When I set up my desk, it’s never a question of which monitor goes where.

IMG_0463 The next thing is making sure that the monitors are always plugged in the right place. In addition to wrapping all three monitors together with zip ties, I have labeled the monitor end in L, M and R for Left Middle and Right obviously, and I have labeled the other end to make sure they always make it into the same ports like pictured.

This way again, if I have to move my setup, I am never concerned about what gets plugged where. As you will find, there are two significant factors that effect the color on the display, the monitor itself, and the video card you are connecting to it. I have two cards, so it’s super important that they are labeled appropriately. I believe in zero room for error!

Tip #2: Tell Your Computer What’s What

Since we have gone through the trouble to identify each monitor clearly and label them, it’s great practice to carry that through. When you calibrate your monitor, especially with one that has a single monitor limitation, you are going to come up with some ugly profiles. I solve that by using a handy little Mac utility called ColorSync Utility, it’s built into the OS and will allow you to both rename the files AND the friendly name that shows up in the OS Color Profile selector.

Tip #3: Trick The Limit

This last one is easy. Profilers like my Spider 2 Express, always calibrate the main monitor. Simply go into your display settings and change the main monitor before you calibrate.

The process is simple, set your main monitor, calibrate it, use the ColorSync utility to rename the profile to match your friendly monitor name, rinse and repeat.

Wrap Up

So those are some simple tips. Another thing to keep in mind, if you are lazy you can only calibrate the monitor you use to edit color.

That’s it, calibrate and enjoy!

SharePhoto – Photowalk at SharePoint Conference 2009

October 14th, 2009 § 2 comments § permalink

Are you going to the SharePoint Conference in Las Vegas next week? Do you dig photography (or just walking around Las Vegas with some cool fellow SharePoint folks)? Since both of those things apply (in my case), in conjunction with @philoking I’m organizing SharePhoto – the unofficial SharePoint Conference Photowalk.

If you’re unfamiliar with the concept of a photowalk (also known as a photostroll), it’s just what the name applies. As a group, we’ll be walking around the Vegas Strip, cameras in hand, taking pictures of things that strike our fancy. And along the way, we’ll have a great time and maybe share some photo tips with each other.

The Gory Details

The photowalk will kick off at 8:30 PM on Wednesday, October 21, 2009. We’ll meet at the lobby of the MGM Grand hotel (so that folks who are participating in #ShareSushi can join us). Follow me on Twitter (@mattstratton) for updates as we progress along the walk, in case you can’t meet us at the kickoff.

I’m still working out the exact route and stops along the way (so keep an eye on this page for updates), but we’ll try to hit some of the more interesting photo opportunities as we make our way north along the Strip. If the mood strikes us, maybe we’ll jump in some cabs and head downtown to Fremont Street, which is a great place for some awesome shots.

We’ll probably finish up around 11:30 PM or so, but it will depend on how everyone is feeling – so it’s not a “hard stop”. The important things to make sure you bring with you are comfortable walking shoes and clothing (don’t forget, it gets a little chilly at night in Vegas), and, of course, your camera. Heck, even if you don’t have a camera, you can feel free to join is, as it should be fun regardless. I also highly recommend bringing a tripod (if you have one), since night photography usually means longer shutter speeds, which means hand-holding is not a good idea.

If you’d like to join us, please head over to the RSVP page here – http://twtvite.com/8lok8y. If you don’t have a Twitter account, you can always RSVP by leaving a comment on this blog post, and I’ll add you to the list. If you have any questions or ideas for SharePhoto, please leave a comment here as well. Looking forward to seeing you all at SPC09!

This photowalk and blog post were inspired by John P, who is organizing a similar photowalk for BlogWorld Expo. If you’re going to the Expo (which is the weekend prior to SPC09), please check out his post about the photowalk occurring there.

Matt Stratton – www.mattstratton.com

What makes a compelling photo?

June 9th, 2009 § 3 comments § permalink

image I haven’t done a photography post in awhile. I have been doing a little nerd bashing (not that I think I am not a nerd, more segmented nerd bashing) and I thought I would take a break for some positive and uplifting thoughts on photography.

If you don’t look at flickr regularly, you should. Their blog RSS feed is usually a highlight of my feed reading when it updates. I am an amateur photographer, although not nearly as motivated as I once was. These days I live my photography vicariously through my friends Scott, John and Steve. They all three use flickr as well as other communities to share their photographs, but that’s not what I want to talk about today. I do suggest you follow their links and check them out after you finish reading this…

Formal thoughts

Of course when I look at a photo, the first thing I am impacted by is the image, which I will talk about next. After I get an initial impression, I start to notice more subtle things like quality of focus, depth of field, color balance, the quality of the exposure, and the composition itself. All of these are ingredients that make up a fantastic photo. Of course there are no hard rules, if a soft focus is part of your idea, then hopefully it works. I know a lot of times I will intentionally under or over-expose a photograph for a specific effect. That being said, each of these ingredients should be considered and you should spend some time, if you are a newbie, getting familiar with the fine arts of exposure, focus, depth of field and last but not least truly understanding the mechanical and technical aspects of your camera.

Exposure Tutorial

Composition Tutorial

Camera Operation

Impact

Impact is what you feel when you first look at a photo. It could be something suggested from the photo or even an emotion or memory it stirs within you for some esoterically connected thought. It really doesn’t matter. The odds are that if the image in question stirs emotions in you, it will with some segment of the people who view it also.

imageThat’s the beauty of photography. It’s really not something you can quantify either. A picture of a coffee cup, smashed on the ground near a gutter might be ugly to you. To someone else it could stir an emotion because they lost their job at a coffee house during the recession. The connections aren’t always obvious or even known to the photographer when the work is published. When you are out looking for that perfect image, leave the formal thoughts we discussed on a shelf at first, look at the world thought your view finder. When you see something that moves you, then carefully consider the options that you have, and construct a photograph.

The other advice I would give is do not only construct one. There are infinite angles, many choices that you can make technically that will eventually set the tone for the image. Capture all of those that you can. Don’t ever think, “I can just do that in Photoshop later.” If you want a shallow depth of field, shoot it that way. If you are dying for a solar flare, get one.

Art, Inspiration and Heart

That’s what it comes down to really. To make something truly artistic, it requires some thought and some diligence to explore all of the options that you have. I am terribly guilty of getting only a few shots of something, and I can tell you when I get home, and start looking through the images I captured that day, I am eventually disappointed that I didn’t change that one little thing.

Fern photo by Steve Handy, Bird photo by John M. Setzler

Photography Lessons: Understanding Lens Blur

February 28th, 2009 § 1 comment § permalink

We have all seen these wonderful photos. There is a subject in very sharp focus, and everything else fades to this soft blur. In photography, this blur is called Bokeh, and the cause is something called Depth of Field. This article is targeted towards those of you with point and shoot cameras or perhaps a fancy new digital SLR that you haven’t quite learned to use yet.

Depth of Field is simply defined as the portion of the scene that appears in focus in the image. Two factors determine the size of depth of field. The distance between the camera and the subject, and the speed of the lens taking the photo. I’ll break down these separately so hopefully it all comes into focus (excuse the pun!)

andy Lens speed is determined by the maximum aperture that the lens will allow you to use. Although it’s somewhat confusing, in lens ratings, the maximum aperture is actually the smaller number. The lenses are rated in what is called an f-stop. The f-stop is a rating that determines how much light the lens let’s through it’s aperture. The smaller the number, the larger the hole. The larger the number the smaller the whole. The subject of f-stops goes much deeper, but for the purpose of this topic, the important thing to know is that the larger the whole (smaller the f-number) the shallower the depth of field becomes. It’s pretty common for consumer point and shoot zoom cameras to have a maximum aperture of f2.8, which is actually really fast. These cameras also decrease the maximum available aperture as you zoom in, so you may find that when you zoom all of the way in on a subject, your maximum aperture could decrease to say f5.6 which in terms of relative speed, lets in dramatically less light and also has a much wider distance of what would be considered in focus.

That’s enough confusing information about f-stops and apertures, just remember that the more light your lens is letting in, the short the slice of distance that will appear in focus is. This is the effect creates these striking images that really isolate the subject in focus from the background around it.

The second factor that determines the portion of the image in focus is the distance you are from the subject itself. The closer you are to a subject, the less of the image will appear in focus. Try this example. Go outside in bright day light. Find a flower, and start about 8’ from the flower. Take a photo of the flower. Without touching the zoom on your camera, take a step forward, and take another photo, take another step, another photo. Keep moving forward until your camera is unable to focus. (all cameras have a minimum focus distance)

Open these photos up on your PC and you will find that the closer you get to the flower in question, the less detailed the image around the flower becomes. This is the effect that distance has on the image. If you want that fancy lens blur, get as close as possible.

For a more in-depth technical lesson, I recommend http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/depth-of-field.htm

Check out some of my photography on Flickr.