DIY Camera Slider Rig

September 11th, 2011 § 4 comments § permalink

We’ve all seen those slick slow pan shots in movies. It’s the kind of slow, subtle, linear motion that you can’t duplicate with a tripod. You can get close with a dolly, but it’s still not quite the same. Purchasing a small rig to do this kind of thing can cost hundreds of dollars, so I decided to make my own. The total cost for this rig is around $60, I’ll list the basic parts at the end, but here’s an idea of what it looks like:

IMG_6149

The rail is two 4’ x 1” square aluminum tubes, supported by three 8” aluminum U shaped channels. The camera car is two heavy steel 90 degree angle brackets bolted to a 1” x 6” piece of pine. I added two handles and bolted a Bogen ball tripod head to the base. The camera car glides on 8 skateboard wheel bearings I purchased from Amazon for about $8. I used a few bolts, washers and nuts to support the bearings and made sure to use a digital caliper when I aligned everything so it would roll square and true. I might add some teflon coating to the rails to reduce noise, they aren’t loud by any means, but if moving fast you would hear them.

IMG_6152

If you are reasonably savvy you should be able to recreate this for yourself. Watch the video clip above, it works quite well.

Index cards can change your life

January 21st, 2011 § 16 comments § permalink

I have been at Microsoft for just over 3 years now. One thing that I have learned is that when we are in full swing, the amount of balls in the air at any given time can be completely overwhelming.

One of my personal weaknesses has not only been my ability to juggle, but my ability to catch all of the balls before they hit the ground. Like most people, I am at my best when I am working on things I am very passionate about, but I become less and less efficient when dealing with things that don’t strike a chord with me personally.

In a collected attempt to remake myself for 2011, I reached out to a coworker who had a process that while I originally mocked it, seemed incredibly effective. Late last year, I sent him an email asking him to explain his process to me, and he responded with a meeting invite and came to my office to show me the ropes.

Kevin laid out a super simple plan that sounded too simple to actually work, but I guess sometimes the best things are. Here are basics:

Carry the index cards with you everywhere you go

This one was easy for me, all day I am usually wearing a hoodie or a jeans or something with pockets, I keep the a half dozen index cards and a pen handy at all times. When I head home, I slip them into an outside pocket on my backpack.

Only use one index card at a time

This one was counter intuitive at first, but in practice it’s an incredibly efficient way to keep yourself from over-committing or letting things pile up. The keys to the kingdom are right here if you ask me. When my card is getting too full, it’s time to make a decision, and there are only two options really. When I can’t seem to fit any more tasks, I need to either stop and knock out some things to get them off my plate, or I need to find a way to delegate or reset expectations for whomever might be depending on me to deliver something. I find myself regularly assessing what I have going on and prioritizing my day into manageable chunks now, and it’s been a huge help for me.

Try to keep a clean card

You might think that having a card full of crossed out things would make you feel like you are just killing it and getting everything done. Crossing things out definitely feels that way, but this step is important to me also. When I get to about 3 empty lines left, I stop and cross out what I have done, and rewrite the unfinished items on a new card. This accomplishes two things: rewriting tasks over and over is a personal nag to just bite the bullet and get it done and a cleaner, emptier card is kind of a mind hack to keep you from feeling overwhelmed. As soon as you start having to sort through crossed out items, or negotiate notes you made in the margins because you were short on room, you’re going down the wrong path.

Break work into manageable chunks

The last thing to mention is how you deal with both big and small tasks on the same card. I use the same card for all of my tasks, and I deal with them exactly the same way. The only difference is how I move forward with big, multi-step problems. This week I took on the task of writing a social media strategy for my team at work. A quick example of how I’ll use the index cards in this task is as follows:

Initially I’ll write “Social Media Plan” when I take on the task. I won’t remove that task from my card until I have effectively scoped what I want to accomplish and set a date for when I intend to deliver it.

I’ll schedule the meeting that I intend to use to present my plan, and break down all of the things I need to do to be prepared for that. I use OneNote for work projects, and I’ll create a notebook and write down all of the tasks I have decided I need to complete to be ready for my presentation.

Once I have the monster scoped, I’ll strike out “Social Media Plan” and write down the first task I need to complete on my index card. At this point it’s rinse and repeat until I have everything I need in place. At that point I might make a note on my card like “Review Plan with Manager.” So I don’t forget to get and incorporate feedback in my plan. Once I am finished with all the tasks and comfortable with the plan, I’ll present it, and follow the exact same process with implementing it.

Notice how I have never let one project dominate my card. It’s always a task I need to complete to make progress.

Closing the loop

Now that you have fixed your problems in getting things done, you can also fix how your coworkers perceive you and help them be more efficient as well. This is how to make sure your index card is helping the rest of your team. When you stop to take time to rewrite your card, also take time to send and email or phone call to the people related to the item you are not moving to the new card. That way people depending on you know that you have finished and they can move forward.

The Impact

As I have already mentioned, this little trick has changed my work life. I respond faster, I get more done, and people who count on me would probably tell you that I am much more reliable in general. Kevin gave me his technique, that he had taken an adapted from someone else. I am giving you mine that I have adapted from Kevin. If you are having trouble keeping yourself organized, this might just be the trick.

Don’t just take my word for it, this is what Kevin had to say when I asked him contribute to this post. One last thing, writing this blog post is on my index card, but not for long!

betoFrom Kevin:

The index card technique was introduced to me by my first manager here at Microsoft, Jim Rodrigues.  When I first got re-orged into CRM , I found my scope of influence growing rapidly after finding myself in a mission critical role of ensuring builds come out on time and automation runs before most of the team comes into work.  Unfortunately, my skills to cope with the increase of things to do did not grow at that same scale.  As a result, I found myself with a lot of things going on and no system to ensure that I was delivering on them.  It got very easy to get in the habit of doing a cursory job on anything that wasn’t an immediate fire drill, and because I wasn’t seeing things through to the finish I found that things would come back to haunt me.

This is some feedback I got verbatim in my review from 2004:
I love the enthusiasm and in the last few months I have seen you really driving for results.  It’s not that you ever did not but now there is more determination than ever before.  You are improving but I would still encourage you to think through a task to 100% completion as it really bugs me when I think we are done with something and then later discover there are issues that we really should have known of.  I don’t have the bandwidth to hands on these items to make sure when we are saying we are done we have thought of everything so I need you and other senior leaders to ensure this.

While brainstorming strategies with Jim, he came up with the index card system to help keep me focused on what is important.  It immediately helped by keeping the volume of work I commit to doing down to a manageable level.  By acknowledging the fact that I can’t accommodate more work because I’m too busy, it helped me avoid overcommitting myself.  And because the workload was manageable, I had the time and space to think through how to REALLY resolve a work item as opposed to just making it go away for the day.  After using the system for a few months and resolving those repetitive, nagging issues in an orderly fashion, I found that I was getting large blocks of free time during the day, which I then in turn invested in increasing my scope of influence and ability to impact my work.  Now I’m at the point where I have a pretty strong emotional connection with my cards and I actually feel happiness when I cross something off, especially something that I know is going to make a material difference in my world.

That’s straight from the horse’s mouth so to speak, and I am a true believer, it really works, ask my team.

Make Your Mac Pro Scream for $200

January 3rd, 2011 § 4 comments § permalink

Friday I finally got around to replacing the drive that died in my Macbook Pro. I decided to get the Seagate Momentus XT hybrid drive as the prices for 256GB SSD drives were just way too far outside my price range. That laptop has a full load of Creative Suite, Logic Studio, Final Cut Express, Office, iLife, iWork…pretty much everything, 120GB of just apps and OS.

The Momentus XT is a 500GB 7200rpm laptop drive with a 4GB Solid State Disk on board, that intelligently caches your most used apps. Instantly my Macbook Pro was a beast, loading apps like Photoshop in 4-5 seconds. The problem was that now my Macbook Pro was faster than my Mac Pro!

Even though I had just replaced the boot drive in my Mac Pro with a 500GB physical disk, I decided it was time to have a little fun with it.

The Mac Pro runs a much smaller load, the boot drive, when cleaned up was just a shade over 30GB. Given that a 40GB would be a tad too small, I decided 80GB was the number.

Which SSD For Me?

A quick search revealed that the Intel X25M 80 GB Solid State Drivealt was the top contender for price and performance so I started there. $200 wasn’t too unreasonable, so I did a little reading to make sure it was what I wanted and found something very interesting.

The Intel X25V 40 GB Solid State Drive, in a RAID 0 pair, is the same price with even better performance. Given that is way nerdier than only one drive, my fate was clear.

I picked up the drives, came home and realized I had to take a quick detour, the Mac Pro only had one HD power connector in the spare drive bay the second optical drive should fit in. Both the Intel drives came with a standard to SATA power connector however, so a quick solder job and I had a splitter cable.

Using the included SATA cables, I routed them to the two unused SATA connectors on the Mac Pro motherboard. That works out great because you have two SSDs in RAID and still have all 4 drive bays for traditional 3.5” disks, no waste!

I put it all back together, booted the Snow Leopard disc, created the array and started a restore from my OS drive to the new drive. It took 12 minutes to copy 31GB from a 7200rpm 3.5” disk to the array of SSDs.

Once done, I opened the select boot disk preference pane and switched my boot drive. The first time, it booted up in about 20 seconds.

I took a slight detour to do some jiggering with my physical drives also, so now all of my data is on a 2TB RAID 0 array also giving me slightly faster speeds.

A Quick RAID 0 Lesson

RAID 0 is not REALLY RAID (Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks) in that it’s not at all Redundant. If one drive goes, the whole volume is toast. In my case I decided to have a slightly unusual strategy to deal with that. I used the old 500GB boot disk as a Time Machine backup of my operating system drive, and I have the entire 2TB disk backed up to Mozy, yikes!

The bottom line is that you do RAID 0 for speed, striping data across disks increases the bandwidth for writing and reading data. Make sure you have a backup plan in place to take care of a data loss.

The Results

The results are nothing short of stunning. After a disk repair, the computer boots in 15 seconds flat, all of my apps just open in seconds, I created this quick video to show how fast, this is Adobe Photoshop CS5 loading after a clean boot.

If you are watching the counter, that’s 3 seconds. Given that I am writing my data elsewhere, the relatively (for SSD) slow write speeds of the 40GB lower end disks just doesn’t come into play. I get tremendous read speeds and my Mac Pro is snappier than ever.

The process is pretty easy, and MacSales.com sells a great, although somewhat expensive, bracket to mount the drives correctly in your optical bay. If you know me, even though it’s not visible, you know I don’t like them just laying around in there.

It’s a quick and relatively inexpensive project that will take your Mac Pro from beast territory to total MONSTER. :)

For a more comprehensive review of benchmarks and performance against other SSD drives on the market, check out this article on TechReport.com.

How Google Democratized Smart Phones

December 27th, 2010 § 4 comments § permalink

Today it occurred to me, Google has taken a play directly from the Microsoft playbook. These days there is a prize fight being fought between Google and Apple for the heart and mind of smart phone users. Apple has a head start, but that doesn’t historically mean a whole lot.

A Brief History Lesson

Back in 1984, Apple released the Macintosh computer. There had been home computers before, but the Macintosh was the first computer that anyone could just sit down and use. Before the Macintosh, computers were obtuse, they required knowledge of arcane commands and were accessed in a, and I am being nice here, less than approachable interface.

Apple came back from Xerox after seeing the mouse and graphical user interface and in perfect Steve Jobs form set out on perfecting it and making it as sexy as possible.

The problem that Apple has never managed to solve is that sexy is expensive. In 1990, 6 years after Apple had released the Macintosh with great success, Microsoft released Windows 3.0. Windows 3.0 was the first version of Windows that had a true graphical windowed environment and it was the first version of Windows that truly caught on with PC makers.

You can practically thank Windows 3.0 for the birth of several major computer manufacturers, namely Gateway, or Gateway 2000 if you are old enough to remember them then.

What Windows 3.0 managed to do was put a computer in your home, with roughly the same capabilities as a Macintosh, but at almost half of the price. Computers were still very expensive then compared to today. A Macintosh went for about $2,495 and a PC with Windows could be had for less than $1,500.

Isn’t This Article About Phones?

Oh yea, that’s right. So what does this have to do with phones? The Apple pundits will tell you “Price doesn’t mean much, you can get an iPhone on contract for $200 and they are selling light hot cakes. That’s true, but there is quite a long tail on that user acceptance curve and the real wealth of users are not yet holding smart phones.

imageAs of 2010, ComScore says 45.5 million people in the United States own smartphones. The mobile phone market is comprised of 234 million subscribers. That’s just in the United States! That means all of the smartphone OS’s, and Palm, Google, Apple, Microsoft and RIM are the biggies, are fighting for less than 20% of the available market. Are these numbers starting to sound familiar?

Today that means 80% of the market aren’t willing to pay for either the phone or the data plan. Google is already trying to figure out ways to subsidize the data plan with advertising, and you can already get Google Android based phones free on contract. This year Best Buy had an Android phone free with contract for every major carrier.

That means we aren’t too far from free Android phones with cheaper data plans. Once Apple has soaked up all of the tech savvy people with expendable income, Google or Microsoft (I hope!) can walk in and just sweep all the remaining people into customers. If you think this sounds crazy, it’s happened before.

It’s like déjà vu over here if you ask me. A “good enough” competitor, prices that attract the consumer at large, and a willingness to let anyone build on their platform to build devices that fit whatever the user wants.

I don’t know about you, but if I was Apple, I’d be looking in the rearview mirror. And in case you think the iPad is any different, read this article again and replace iPhone with iPad in your mind.

Justifying Theft

December 16th, 2010 § 5 comments § permalink

In a tailspin side conversation based on the legality of downloading music, someone made the comment that when you are poor, it’s ok to steal software, music and movies because the companies that generate them aren’t technically losing any revenue.

The full comment was so ridiculous I won’t even repeat it here, but the comments on that have started another interesting topic. I say interesting, when in reality I mean dumb. The idea is that you can justify taking something that you didn’t pay for as long as a) you couldn’t afford to pay for it and b) the company isn’t losing money by you doing so.

Perhaps I am hyper-sensitive to it because I work for a company that pays me based on the money they make selling software. Perhaps I am annoyed by it because I pay for software and music and it bugs me that prices I pay are inflated to pay for all the jerks that steal it.

To that end, the comment thread is as follows:

Look, when you’re poor like me, you’re not going to buy those products anyway, so they are not losing any revenue. I do make a practice of financially supporting things I like when I *can*, but the reality is that most of us simply can’t. And when it comes to things that are simply essential for getting by in modern society, like PHOTOSHOP, which is a 600 dollar program… well, it’s almost criminal to deny the poor access to it.

I was amused by the contention that Adobe was criminal in denying poor citizens basic essentials like food, water, the right to free speech and the right to edit their Facebook photos to make them look less fat.

But the supporting comments, while admitting the criminal part was silly, agreed that the logic was sound. The logic is sound? Stealing is ok, sometimes?

To that end, I felt my comment response deserved it’s own post.

That’s just trying to justify stealing… if that were the case then it would be “ok” to sneak into a movie or concert you couldn’t afford to pay for or sit in college classes you weren’t enrolled for. When did our society lose our moral compass so bad that it’s a “logical” argument that it’s OK to steal as long as it doesn’t appear as the company is being economically hurt by doing so. I am pretty sure stealing is stealing regardless of the financial impact it causes. If someone gives you something for free, is it OK for me to take it since it doesn’t hurt you economically?

The reality is that the company IS being economically hurt by this kind of theft. In the case of Adobe, they put out quite functional lower end products that are priced for the consumer who can’t (and shouldn’t) be paying for their flagship product. I think you could make a solid argument that many people are stealing Adobe Photoshop CS5 and that is causing a loss to Adobe for sales of Photoshop Elements.

The other problem is this “because I can’t pay for it” is bullshit. It’s because you don’t want to. You bought the computer, you bought the digital camera…because you HAD to, you couldn’t steal those. Now you are claiming that you are too poor to buy the software that you want to use to get the most out of them. Cry me a river.

If you wanted a photo editing system, you should have scaled back your camera and computer if $80 for Photoshop Elements was out of your budget. I have a fully licensed copy of Adobe Photoshop CS5 for Mac and on my PC I use Photoshop Elements. I can’t imagine any normal consumer who wouldn’t be fully served by the latter, it does 90% of what Photoshop CS5 does.

Stealing is stealing…

That’s right, stealing IS stealing. If you are doing something that requires Adobe’s $2,600 flagship product suite, I would HOPE that you are getting paid to do it. If not, I would *hope* that you bought it for WAY less because you are going to school to LEARN to do it. If not, I would hope that you, like me, took advantage of Adobe’s educational discount program and got it at a reasonable price ($350 for the Design Standard Suite).

If you aren’t in those buckets, look into a cheaper or free alternative. There are appropriate options for all situations and none of them justify stealing it.